21 Jan 16 mm, is it enough for portraits?

Source: Fuji X Passion

Hi, thank you for the opportunity to be part of this magazine again! This time we will focus on portrait photography with the Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8. In the past, I had an XF 23mm f/1.4 and a Samyang 12mm f/2.0. After 2,5 years of shooting with these lenses, I found that I needed a change to be able to shoot what I really want. First I bought a Mitakon 35mm f/0.95 and about a year later the XF 16mm f/2.8. Mitakon is my favorite manual lens of all time, because what it can do during sunset/sunrise light is magical!

Fuji X-Pro2 . Fuji XF16mmF2.8 . f/2.8 . 1/500″ . ISO 400

Fuji X-Pro2 . Fuji XF16mmF2.8 . f/4.5 . 1/250″ . ISO 400

Fuji X-Pro2 . Fuji XF16mmF2.8 . f/2.8 . 1/60″ . ISO 3200

A little more to my current gear. I have a Fujifilm X-Pro2 + XF 16mm f/2.8, and I recently bought a used X-Pro 1 and have been using it with the Mitakon 35mm f/0.95 ever since. I think that the X-Pro 1 and Mitakon are a perfect match! A lot of people try to get the latest/newest equipment, but I don’t think that’s always necessary. After 2 months of taking photos with the X-Pro 1 and X-Pro 2, no one knew the difference.

Of course, the X-Pro 1 is slower and it can be seen that the quality of camera production between X-Pro 1 and X-Pro 2 has

16 mm, is it enough for portraits? posted on Fuji X Passion on

Read the full article on Fuji X Passion